Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Surgeon ; 19(2): e42-e48, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1294258

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: COVID-19 pandemic has created havoc all over the globe and spared no one regardless of status, gender, location and ethnicity. There were questions raised if trauma and orthopaedic (T&O) procedures actually generated aerosols? The need for a review of literature highlighting the nature and impact of aerosol generation within T&O surgery was noted. METHODS: A comprehensive online search was performed for all published articles in the English language, evaluating AGPs in T&O surgery and the relevant personal protection equipment used. RESULTS: The search strategy populated 43 studies. Six studies were identified as duplicates. The shortlisted 37 studies were screened and nine studies were included in the review. An additional four studies were included from the bibliography review. CONCLUSION: Most orthopaedic procedures are high-risk aerosol generating procedures (AGPs). Conventional surgical masks do not offer protection against high-risk AGPs. In the current era of COVID-19 pandemic, there is a significant risk to the transmission of infection to the theatre staff. For protection against airborne transmission, appropriate masks should be used. These need proper fitting and sizing to ensure full protection when used.


Subject(s)
Aerosols/adverse effects , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/transmission , Infection Control/methods , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Orthopedic Procedures/methods , Traumatology/methods , COVID-19/epidemiology , Global Health , Humans , Infection Control/instrumentation , Pandemics , Personal Protective Equipment
2.
BMJ Open ; 10(11): e042090, 2020 11 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-927074

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe the characteristics and outcomes of hospitalised patients with COVID-19 from UK in the highest decile of health and gross regional products per capita. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Recruited all adult inpatients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 symptoms admitted to a single Surrey centre between March and April 2020. Extensive demographic details were documented. OUTCOME MEASURE: COVID-19 status of alive/dead and intensive care unit (ICU) status of yes/no. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with COVID-19 from Surrey centre UK (n=429). RESULTS: 429 adult inpatients (mean age 70±18 years; men 56.4%) were included in this study, of whom, 19.1% required admission to ICU and 31.9% died. Adverse outcomes were associated with age (OR with each decade of years: 1.78, 95% CI 1.53 to 2.11, p<0.001 for mortality); male gender (OR=1.08, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.63, p=0.72, present in 70.7%, of admissions to ICU versus 53% of other cases, p=0.004); cardiac disease (OR=3.43, 95% CI 2.10 to 5.63, p<0.001), diabetes mellitus (OR=2.37, 95% CI 1.09 to 5.17, p=0.028) and dementia (OR=5.06, 95% CI 2.79 to 9.44, p<0.001). There was no significant impact of ethnicity or body mass index on disease outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Despite reports of worse outcomes in deprived regions, we show similar complication and mortality rates due to COVID-19 in an affluent and high life expectancy region.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Inpatients , Intensive Care Units , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Hospital Mortality/trends , Hospitalization/trends , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , United Kingdom/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL